Court of Appeal Ruling on Motor Finance Mis-selling Provides Potential Boost for UK Economy
07 November 2024, Cheltenham, UK – The recent Court of Appeal ruling in Johnson v. FirstRand Bank, supported by consumer rights advocates Sentinel Legal, has the potential to provide a significant economic boost for the UK economy. With the government’s urgent focus on addressing the national deficit, this landmark decision could result in billions of pounds being channeled back into the economy through compensation for motor finance mis-selling.
The Budget’s emphasis on stimulating growth and bridging the funding gap highlights the current financial challenges facing the country. The Johnson ruling, which allows for compensation claims for mis-sold motor finance agreements, has the potential to have a similar impact as the Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) scandal recovery did after the 2008 financial crisis. At its peak, PPI compensation payments contributed up to 3% of the UK’s GDP, providing a vital post-recession boost to both the economy and consumer confidence. The potential scale of motor finance mis-selling related compensation could see similar outcomes, directly benefitting both consumers and the government.
According to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), 90% of all new cars are bought using finance, either through a specialist car finance lender or a high street bank. This means the ruling’s impact could reach millions of UK households. The FCA also estimates that more than 75% of all cars on the roads may be affected, potentially resulting in over £21 billion going back into the economy through compensation being paid out by car finance lenders.
The government also stands to benefit from this ruling, as compensation payments could be taxed at source, with law firms retaining a portion of the tax on payouts before distribution to consumers. Similar to the PPI precedent, this could generate a substantial revenue stream for the government. In the case of PPI, this approach generated billions for the Exchequer over several years. A similar mechanism applied to motor finance mis-selling compensation could contribute significantly to government revenues at a time of critical need.
Sam Ward, Director at Sentinel Legal, stated, “This ruling provides a rare opportunity for a win-win scenario: justice and financial redress for consumers while also contributing to economic recovery and government revenues. The similarities to PPI’s economic impact are striking, and we believe this case has the potential to provide the economic stimulus our country needs.”
For consumers, this ruling offers the chance to recover compensation from lenders who engaged in predatory finance practices, with funds potentially being reinvested into the economy. For the motor finance industry, it highlights the need for transparency and accountability.
Ward added, “Through compensation payments, we are not only providing financial redress, but also putting money back in the pockets of consumers during a time when household budgets are tight and household essentials are becoming increasingly more expensive. This is an opportunity to genuinely help the Great British public, and the timing couldn’t be better. People are really struggling.”
The Johnson v. FirstRand Bank ruling, set by the Court of Appeal, the second highest court in the country, empowers consumers to hold lenders accountable for unfair practices, excessive interest rates, and undisclosed commissions. Sentinel Legal offers free consultations to those who believe they may be eligible for compensation, providing a transparent, no-win, no-fee service for UK households seeking redress.
With a proven track record, Sentinel Legal has already secured over £300,000 in compensation for motor finance claims on behalf of consumers and continues to work closely with regulatory bodies.
