Gold hit an all-time high near $5,600 an ounce in late January. It’s been sliding pretty much nonstop since then, and on June 19 the bank most responsible for hyping that rally finally caught up to where the price actually is.
Goldman Sachs cut its year-end gold target by $500, down to $4,900 from $5,400. Seeking Alpha noted that the new number still points to gains from current levels, just smaller than what Goldman had been promising clients for most of the year. Bloomberg traced the call directly to analysts Lina Thomas and Daan Struyven.
The Fed is basically the whole story here
Goldman no longer believes the Fed cuts rates at all in 2026. Full stop, that’s the reversal. Lower rates make gold, which pays you nothing for holding it, look better next to bonds and cash. The bank’s old $5,400 call leaned hard on aggressive cuts weakening the dollar and pulling money into bullion. That math doesn’t work anymore.
The Fed held steady at its last meeting, and new Chair Kevin Warsh‘s first meeting running the show came off more hawkish than anyone expected, Bloomberg reported. Goldman’s own economists pushed the next two rate cuts out to June and December 2027. They’d previously had those penciled in for December 2026 and March 2027. That’s not a small delay.
“We are moderating our forecast for gold price appreciation for two reasons,” Thomas and Struyven wrote, according to Benzinga.
It’s not just rates dragging on gold
Rates weren’t the only thing Goldman flagged. The bank also trimmed how much it expects to flow into gold ETFs going forward, and those funds have been one of the more dependable demand sources behind gold’s run for most of this cycle. Less ETF money plus a less dovish Fed, that’s a worse setup than the one Goldman was working off in January.
More Gold & Silver:
- UBS revamps gold price target for the rest of 2026
- Silver price hits new low, here is what comes next
- Analyst sends blunt message as gold, silver reach multiyear highs
Worth sitting with for a second: this is Goldman we’re talking about. The bank has been arguably the loudest bull on gold of any major house for years now.
“Structurally constructive but tactically cautious, with near-term downside risk and medium-term upside risk.” That’s how Thomas and Struyven framed where they stand now.
And there’s a worse scenario Goldman is still flagging
Goldman didn’t just trim the base case and call it a day. If the Fed actually hikes instead of holding, the bank thinks gold could slide to $4,400 by year-end, since a hike would make gold’s whole case as a policy hedge fall apart faster, Bloomberg reported. This isn’t a hypothetical someone made up for a worst-case slide. Rob Kaplan, a Goldman vice chairman and former Dallas Fed president, said in a Bloomberg TV interview that the Fed could need to hike as soon as September if inflation stays stubborn.
Markets are already leaning that way. CME FedWatch puts the odds of a quarter-point hike in July at roughly 40%, and traders see a 61% chance of two cumulative hikes by December. Push out to March 2027 and the odds of two hikes climb to nearly 95%, according to Benzinga.
Gold still has some things going for it
Central banks haven’t stopped buying, for what it’s worth. Official institutions turned net buyers again in April, picking up 19 tonnes, and about 45% of central banks surveyed by the World Gold Council say they plan to keep growing their reserves over the next year, Mining.com reported.
And this isn’t even the first time Goldman has had to defend this call in 2026. The bank reaffirmed its $5,400 target on April 4, right after gold had just suffered its worst monthly drop since 2013. Go back further and you’ll see the pattern: Goldman had actually raised its target to $5,400 from $4,900 back in January, citing the exact same central bank buying and ETF demand it’s now saying is cooling off.
Frame/Getty Images
Other banks aren’t buying Goldman’s caution
Not everyone on Wall Street is moving the same direction. Wells Fargo actually raised its 2026 target to a $6,100 to $6,300 range on March 28, arguing the pullback was a buying opportunity rather than the start of something worse. JPMorgan is sitting at $6,300, UBS at $6,200. Both well above where Goldman just landed.
So the split among major banks on where gold ends up has gotten wider, not narrower, even though everyone is looking at roughly the same data. Goldman thinks the Fed’s patience changes the math in a real way. The banks still up near $6,000 are essentially betting that central bank demand and the broader dollar story matter more than what happens at the next few Fed meetings.
Where this leaves gold investors
One bank trimming a price target by $500 isn’t a verdict on gold by itself. Goldman hasn’t gone bearish here. It still sees gains by year-end, just smaller ones, and the long-term case, currency debasement, fiscal concerns, all of that hasn’t gone anywhere in Goldman’s thinking.
What this really tells you is how much gold’s next few months hinge on a handful of Fed meetings. Cool inflation faster than expected, and the rate-cut story comes roaring back. A surprise hike, and Goldman’s downside case starts looking prescient. Either way, the bank that talked everyone into gold’s January record is now telling clients the easy money already got made.
