JPMorgan latest Broadcom outlook sends key signal

Somewhere in the past few weeks, a supply chain rumor got out that a chip program Broadcom has been working on with Google might be running late.

Nobody confirmed it. No contract was lost, no customer pulled back, no earnings were restated. Just a rumor, and yet Broadcom’s stock shed nearly 7% in the month that followed.

On June 17, JPMorgan analyst Harlan Sur essentially called that reaction overdone. The bank reiterated its overweight rating and told clients they should be “aggressive buyers at current levels,” CNBC reported. Broadcom’s stock jumped more than 6% intraday before closing up 4.3%.

Why JPMorgan isn’t buying the bearish read on Broadcom

Sur’s argument is not complicated. The supply chain concerns, he wrote, have overstated the risks. And when you actually look at what underpins Broadcom’s business right now, it is hard to disagree.

This is a company that has multi-year AI compute agreements locked in with Google, Anthropic, OpenAI, and Meta.

More Wall Street:

These are disclosed commitments with specific delivery windows stretching to the end of the decade. A timing question on one chip program does not undo that, CNBC confirmed.

Sur also pointed to something worth remembering about Broadcom’s track record with Google specifically: The company has helped bring 14 of Google’s most advanced chip designs to market over the past 12 years.

That kind of relationship, built over more than a decade, does not fall apart because of a delayed rollout. It is exactly the kind of depth that makes Broadcom hard to replace.

The 2028 number buried in JPMorgan’s earlier note

Most of the coverage on June 17 focused on the “aggressive buyers” line. This is fair; that is what moved the stock.

But JPMorgan’s June 4 note, written right after Broadcom’s blowout quarterly results, contained something that got less attention: a fiscal 2028 AI revenue estimate that sits dramatically above anything the current Wall Street consensus reflects, Investing.com noted.

JPMorgan frames it as a scenario — what the math produces if the committed programs from Google, Meta, Anthropic, and others execute on schedule.

The ramp between now and 2028 is steep, and a lot can change, but the bank put a specific number in a published note. That is not something analysts do lightly when the number is as large as what JPMorgan described.

Sur also pointed to something worth remembering about Broadcom’s track record with Google specifically.

Morris/Getty Images

What the Broadcom sell-off was really about

Broadcom is an expensive stock, and investors who own it know why they are paying up. They believe the AI infrastructure buildout has years to run and that Broadcom is one of the clearest ways to own that thesis.

When you are paying a premium for that story, any hint of a problem lands harder than it would for a cheaper stock.

The Google TPU rumor was not a bombshell. But in a market primed for bad news on AI, it did not need to be.

JPMorgan’s read is that the sell-off was a sentiment move, not a fundamental one. The customer commitments are still there, the execution track record is still there, and the June 4 earnings beat that prompted the target raise is still there.

Sur’s note on June 17 was a reminder of all of that, delivered at a moment when the market had briefly forgotten it.

What Broadcom investors’ reaction says about where the AI trade stands

There is a broader pattern worth noticing here. We are at a point in the AI cycle where investors are starting to get jumpy. Not about whether AI is real (nobody serious is arguing that anymore), but about whether the stocks built on AI expectations can keep living up to them.

Every delay report, every margin compression warning, every analyst note that sounds even slightly cautious gets treated like it might be the beginning of the end.

JPMorgan is pushing back on that mood as it applies to Broadcom. The evidence still holds up, Sur is saying, and investors who bailed on a supply-chain rumor may end up regretting it.

Whether he is right depends on what Broadcom actually delivers. But “aggressive buyers” is not language analysts use when they have doubts.